Town of Putnam Project Review

Town of Putnam
123 Lower Road
PO Box 95
Putnam Station, NY  12861

No web site available at this time
Planning Board Clerk 518-547-8317 (phone and fax)
 
Town of Putnam Topics of Interest

CALDER

CATLIN

CONNOR 

COVINO

DAVIS

DENNO

ELIOPOULOS

FAETH

FISHER

FREUD

GRENNON

HANDLEY SUBDIVISION (TIROGA MEADOWS)

 HARDING

HERTTUA

JACOBS/STAFFORD

JOHNSON

MORGAN

ROYAL ANCHORAGE

SMITH

SWEET

WHITE

ADIRONDACK CAMP (UPDATED 1/19/12)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes a two lot subdivision to subdivide the owners house from the remainder of the camp located at Warick Road. The property is designated Moderate Intensity Use on the Adirondack Park Land Use and Development Map.  The proposed lot will have access on the existing drive for the camp and will require a waiver from requirement of public road frontage.  The property will require easements for septic system and maintance and access to existing dock, driveway access. Wastewater treatment will still be provided by the camp.  

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper recommends the need for proper legal easement for the wastewater treatment system and specifications on maintenance.  Regarding the 12/11 resubmission, the Waterkeeper had concerns about the lack of soil investigations for the alternative onsite wastewater treatment system, need to show footprint of the existing dwelling, detail the wastewater treatment easement and obtain APA jurisdiction letter.

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board, November and December 2011.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board reviewed a sketch plan for the proposed 2 lot subdivision at the November 8, 2011 Planning Board meeting.  The Board stated a waiver would be required from the requirement for public road frontage.  The Board stated the need to show an alternative location for wastewater treatment on the proposed lot.  The Board said all easements would be required for the Preliminary Plan.  The Planning Board reviewed a revised application at their December 14, 2011 meeting and accepted the application and deemed it a minor subdivision.  A waiver was granted for the required frontage on a public road due to no change in the road width or surface.  The Board expressed concern about the lack of verification on the wastewater system location and requested contact with the Code Enforcement Officer.  A public hearing was scheduled for January 11, 2012.  The Waterkeeper expressed concern at the public hearing regarding the need to provide testing to verify a suitable location for wastewater treatment, which one Board flet uncomfortable approving the subdivision without.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board approved the 2-lot subdivision without conditions 4-0.

BOYCE (UPDATED 2/14/11)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes an addition to an existing dwelling located at 2164 Black Point Road (1.18-1-15).  The addition will include a three season screened porch.  The addition will have a 71 foot setback to the shoreline.  The dweeling is currently connected to the Black Point Road Swer District.  There is no stormwater management evident at the site.  There are four large trees to the west of the dwelling that stablize a bank with a landscape tie wall.  It was not clear if these trees would be removed or the disturbance that would occur to the bank.  At the November 2010 Planning Board meeting, the applicant claims there are two rain pits proposed on the site plan, which should be clarified.

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper recommends the installation of stormwater management and details on the stablization of the bank to the west of the dwelling/addition, especially if trees are going to be removed. 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board, November 2010. 

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board will review the application at their November 10, 2010 Planning Board meeting. At the November 2010 meeting, the Planning Board deemed the project to be a Type I but did not decide if a public hearing would be set.  The Planning Board tabled the application pending the submission of the following information:  Stormwater management plan; contacting the neighbors regarding the project; and APA non jurisdictional letter.  The item was removed from the agenda of the December 8, 2010 Planning Board meeting at the request of the applicant.  At the February 9, 2011 meeting, the Putnam Planning Board reviewed the proposed site plan.  The applicant submitted a nonjurisidictional letter from the APA.  The Planning Board suggested additional stone around the proposed "gutter sumps"/dry wells.  Site Plan was approved based on Waterkeeper comments, 7-0.  

CALDER (UPDATED 5/5/10)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes an addition to an existing residence at 5142 Bayview Way on Dark Bay (12-4-16).  Proposed addition will add 1/2 2nd floor addition and add 1/2 basement for storage.  Current foundation on piers and foundation will be enclosed with a height of 6-1/2 ft.  Roof line will be raised approximastely 7 feet with possible impact to neighbors.  Number of bedrooms will remain at two.  Two large trees are proposed to be removed.  New on-site wastewater treatment system proposed with peat filters to be located 240 feet from lake.  Slowing of stormwater is anticipated.  Planning Board determined project was Type II Site Plan Review.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the need for site plans for the proposed on-site wastewater treatment system, need to size the OWTS for future bedrooms (addition) and incorporate stormwater management, recommended rain gardens. 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board, February 2010.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board determined the application was Type II Site Plan at the February 10, 2010 meeting.  The Planning Board requested information regarding the peat system, information on the building height and roof line and recommended stormwater management (Fact Sheets from the FUND/Waterkeeper were provided).  The Planning Board scheduled a public hearing for March 10, 2010 at 7:00PM.  The application was discussed at the public and the Waterkeeper and neighbors commented.  The Planning Board expressed concern about the stormwater runoff and location of the septic absorption field in the driveway cul-de-sac.  Tabled the application for additional information.  The applicant submitted temporary and permanent stormwater management controls and proposed to relocate the absorption field to a more level location with a greater setback to the lake at the April 14, 2010 Planning Board meeting.  The Planning Board approved the Site Plan application with conditions:  1) relocate absorption field to specified location with an engineered system; and 2) provide stone trench at bottom of driveway and parking area for stormwater management.

CATLIN (UPDATED 6/18/09)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes the construction of a new home on a vacant lot on Black Point Road (4.51-1-28.3).  Proposed house will be 26'x38' (1480 sf), 3 story high with a 50' setback from the lake.  The lot will be serviced by the new Black Point Sewer District.  No information was provided regarding proposed stormwater management.  There is an existing stream flowing through the property with potential wetlands.  The Planning Board expressed concerns about the lot as well as several neighbors.  There is a claim the stream has been diverted onto a neighbors property.    

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the existing stream and ability of the small lot to support the proposed development while accomodating stormwater management.

Waterkeeper Comments:

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board accepted the application and deemed the application as a Type II action.  The Planning Board required the applicant to contact the DEC, APA and LGPC and determine if the proposed side setback is adequate to service the side of the house.

 CONNOR (UPDATED 5/28/09)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes the construction of a new home on an existing footprint at 5163 Sagamore Rd.  The house is located 130 ft from Lake George.  The applicant proposes 2 bedrooms (same as existing) and will be utilizing the existing on-site wastewater treatment system.  The system has been accepted by Bill Ball, Town of Putnam Code Enforcement Officer.  The applicant has received a Stormwater Permit for a minor stormwater plan from the Lake George Park Commission  (5346-17-07).  The stormwater system proposed a 10'x10'x1.5 sediment trap for the driveway and nothing is indicated for the house.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included:  the lack of stormwater management for the house and additional information regarding the existing on-site wastewater treatment system, including design flows and certification of the system. 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board May 2009.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board held a public hearing on May 13, 2009 and approved the project.

COVINO (UPDATED 10/19/10)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes to construct a driveway to a recreational area and install an acess tdrive o a proposed wastewater treatment area on existing easements on Lot 1 of proposed Eliopoulos subdivision.  The driveway to the recreational area is located 10' from an existing stream.  Stormwater management is proposed along the road consisting of subsurface galleries. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included: need for wetlands survey; increase driveway separation from existing stream; need to provide soil investigations where infiltration galleries are proposed; determine of project is a major stormwater project; details on proposed stormwater management system; and determination of compliance with NYSDOH onsite wastewater treatment regulations. 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board September 2010.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board reviewed the application at their September 8, 2010 meeting.  The Planning Board decided not to accept the application based on the easements were not valid since information was not part of an approved subdivision. 

DAVIS (UPDATED 12/18/12)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes to construct two 44' long x 34' wide U-shped pile supported association docks located at 2522 Northern Lights Point (7.12-1-17).  The project is designated as Moderate Intensity on the Adirondack Park Land Use and Development Map.  The applicant has more thatn 550 feet of lake front and is proposing te docks to serve existing residents in the Glenburnie Community.  The project will require a permit from the Lake George Park Commission as well as Site Pla Review by the Town of Puntam Planning Board.  The Lake George Park Commission has made a determination the proposed docks are association docks despite the fact the docks will be located on private property.  

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included: future precedent of creating "association docks" when the operations are more like a commercial marina; long term enforcement of the ownership of the slips by residents of Glenburnie; impacts for the development of the site including the need for parking, wastewater, stormwater, garbage, and disturbance issues.  The Waterkeeper concerns to the Town of Putnam Planning Board included:  impact on shoreline, precedent setting decision, environmental review concerns and jurisdictional concerns.

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Waterkeeper comment letter to the Lake George Park Commission May & September 2012 and to the Town of Putnam December 2012.

Next Meeting: The Lake George Park Commission had a public comment period that was open until May 8, 2012 and was extended until May 15, 2012.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board submitted a list of concerns to the LGPC including: access, road ownership; parking; garbage; sanitation; stormwater controls; water use safety issue; renting of slips; sale of docks outside the park; conformance with Town of Putnam Ordinances; emergency vehicle access; day use of docks; and extend comment period until June 14, 2012.  The applicant's agent attended the August 8, 2012 Planning Board meeting and questioned the Town's jurisdicition due to the recent Court decision regarding the State's oversight of docks on state waters.  The agent stated most of the Town's concerns would be applicable if s Site Plan Review was necessary but claims one is not since there is no change in land use - the docks willl be for residential purposes for the HOA and not commercial use.  The Planning Board stated the use will violate the Gull Bay/Glenburnie/Black Point Residential Specia District that was adopted by the Town in the 1970s.  The applicant subsequently revised the application by eliminating one of the docks and presented to the Town of Putnam Planning Board at the September 12, 2012 meeting.  The Planning Board expressed concerns about the right-of-way and the commercial enterprise in the residential district.  The application was heard by the Lake George Park Commission at their September 25, 2012 meeting.  The LGPC staff prepared a Negative Declaration for the application for review by the Commission.  After the applicant's presentation and public opposition, it was determined by the LGPC to table the application pending review of the SEQR documents and receive a recommendation from staff after public comment.   A public hearing was scheduled for the October 10, 2012 Town of Putnam Planning Board meeting.  The applicant stated that the Town was limited to only the review of the 216 sf associated with the parking area for 4 golf carts.  The Town Planning Board stated concerns about the compliance with the Residential Ordinance and the potential precident that would set regarding shoreline development and funneling.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board tabled the application pending review by the LGPC.  In October, the Adirondack Park Agency issued two decisions, a first on 10/12/12 determing the project was jurisdictional and then reversed that determination on 10/23/12.  At the November 27, 2012 Lake George Park Commission meeting, the Commission approved the project application and issued a Negative Declaration, 6-1, with a condition that an erosion control plan be submitted.  The Commission felt the deed restrictions were protective and the future dock owners would be required to be existing home owners in Glenburnie.   The project was in front of the Town of Putnam Planning Board for Site Plan Review on December 12, 2012.  At that meeting, the Planning Board could not pass a resolution regarding the application and requested a determination from the Town Board regarding the intent of the 1971 Residential Ordinance in Glenburnie.

DENNO (UPDATED 7/26/11)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes to construct a single family dwelling at 6630 Royal Anchorage Way in the Royal Anchorage Subdivision (11.8-5-1).  The project is located on a 1.16 acre parcel.  A 1-1/2 story dweeling with acrawl space is proposed with dimensions of 38' x 27'.  The house is proposed to have a 75 foot setback from the shoreline but it unclear if this includes a porch shown on the house plans.  The dwelling will connect to the Royal Anchorage Sewer District and use the lake for a water supply.  An infiltration trench is proposed for stormwater management down gradient of the dwelling.  At the November 2010 Planning Board meeting, the applicant stated the APA had visited the site and does not have a problem with the proposal and the project is part of an APA approved subdivision.  The applicant has met with the LGPC regarding stormwater and the LGPC stressed concerns about addressing upland runoff.  The applicant stated that 4-5 feet of fill has been brought to the property from the sewer project and silt fence has been in place.  The applicant has submitted an application to the LGPC for a stormwater permit and requires a variance for relief from the 100 foot required separation distance between wells and stormwater infiltration devices.  The applicant modified the stormwater plan to address concerns by the LGPC including - providing 4' of stone topped with 6" of mulch; placed additional stormwater management on the north side and south side of the dwelling; added stormwater management in the driveway and proposes rain barrels.  The applicant made further revisions planning to incorporate a rain garden in area of the blasted rock.  May 2011 - The applicant provided a resubmission to the Town of Planning Board for the May 11, 2011 meeting, which did not include a site plan or stormwater management information. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns include: lack of soil investigations, lack of conveyance measures on the site plan, porch may be located in the shoreline setback and stabilization of the site. May 2011 - The Waterkeeper was concerned about the lack of a site plan submitted for the site plan review. 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board November 2010 and May 2011.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board will review the application at the November 10, 2010 Planning Board meeting.  At the November 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board deemed the project a Type II project and set a public hearing for December 8, 2010.  The applicant failed to provide adequate notice to the Planning Board to postpone the public hearing and the Planning Board determined the application needs to be resubmitted.  The LGPC will discuss the varaince request at the December 21, 2010 meeting.   At the December 21, 2011 LGPC meeting, staff supported the application despite the lack of detailed information regarding the amount of rock to be removed or amount of existing soils.  the Commission granted the variance with the following conditions:  1) provide project plan with profiles depicting existing and proposed site conditions including strucutres, fill grading and stormwater devices; 2) specify the amount of impervious directed to each stormwater device; 3) specify the dimensions of all stormwater devices; 4) specify the composition of all stormwater devices; and 5) provide outlet protection for any upland runoff diversions.  The Town of Puntam Planning Board reviewed the application at their May 11, 2011 meeting.  At that meeting, the applicant provided copies of a permit amendment from the APA to Royal Anchorage Estates allowing an increased living space upto 2,250 sf and provided a copy of the Lake George Park Commission permit.  The Planning Board scheduled a public hearing for June 8, 2011.  At the June 8, 2011 public hearing, it was noted that a revised site plan had not been submitted and the public hearing was extended until the July 13, 2011 meeting.  At the July 13, 2011 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board granted final approval for the site plan review. 

ELIOPOULOS SUBDIVISION (UPDATED 5/16/12)

Project Summary: The applicant is seeking a six lot subdivision of the point where Bythewood is located on the south shore of Gull Bay.  The total areage is approximately 8.5 acres with nearly 1/2 mile of shoreline, including Skerrey Point.  The land is designated Low Intensity Use on the lake side of Gull Bay Road and Rural Use on the east side of Gull Bay Road.  The proposed lots will be serviced by on-site wastewater treatment systems and wells.  All lots will have lake access, some with easements through other properties.   DECEMBER 2009 - The applicant revised the application for a five lot subdivision, similiar to the previous submission which was denied except for the removal of one lake side lot.  The revised application was presented at the May 2010 Planning Board meeting.  It was determined the subdivision was a 5-lot subdivision including the Blythewood property.  September 2010 - The applicant submitted an application for a proposed driveway to access proposed Lots 2 & 3.  The plan also proposed a second alternative driveway access for Lot 2.  The plan provided conceptual locations for stormwater management but no detailed information.  October 2010 - The applicant resubmitted another application for a 4 lot subdivision.  The lot layout remained similiar to the May 2010 plan with 3 lots on the west side of Gull Bay Road and 1 lot on the east side.  The plan proposed a common driveway to Lots 2 & 3 to the north side of the existing gatehouse.  The plan contained new soil test information and proposed standard absorption systems on Lots 2, 3 & 4 and proposed to utilize the existing septic system (seepage pit) on Lot 1.  NOVEMBER 2010 - The applicant submitted a letter from the APA stating no wetlands were on the property but there is an intermittent stream present.  The applicant proposes to keep the recreationsal access drive near the intermittent stream.  The applicant provided additional information at the December 2010 meeting regarding the onsite wastewater systems for Lots 2 and 3 and a letter from the owner regarding the easements for Blythewood across Lot 4.  JANUARY 2011 - Revised plans were submitted which included individual lot onsite wastewater treatment plans and stormwater management.  APRIL 2011 - Revised plans were submitted that included a stormwater management plan for 4 lots, individual onsite wastewater treatment systems and a combined driveway for Lots 2 & 3.  A non-jurisdictional letter from the APA was also received.  JULY 2011 - The applicant presented a project update to the Planning Board, which included informing the Board of the submission of the stormwater management plan to the LGPC, who determined the project would be considered as a major stormwater project.  Soil investigations are being performed.  The applicant requested the Town of Putnam Planning Board declare themselves lead agancy for the SEQR review but the Planning Board recommended the LGPC be lead agency since the are more prepared to perform the Long Form EAF review.  SEPTEMBER 2011 - The applicant has modified the proposed subdivision and eliminated one lot on the lake side of Gull Bay Road and eliminated the access drive and retaining wall to access proposed lots.   OCTOBER 2011 - The applicant further modified the site plan to relocate the OWTS on Lot 2 (gatehouse) to move to the west of the house, relocated the driveway for Lot 4 to the existing forest road location and provided clarifications on the site plan.  DECEMBER 2011 - The applicant revised the stormwater plan for Lot 4 driveway and added the permitted and proposed docks.  JANUARY 2012 -   The applicant determined to refuse to modify the plan as requested by the Planning Board and maintained the property lines, proposed 6,000 sf footprints, clearing on Lot 2, existing driveway/road width to Lot 1 (Blythewood), existing septic field easements on Lot 4.

Waterkeeper Perspective: The   Waterkeeper is concerned about the concentration of development on the lake side of Gull Bay Road, six lots proposed (four new lots and the existing Blythewood and carriage house).  The proposed on-site wastewater treatment systems are proposed on steep slopes with marginal soils in close proximity to the lake.  There is concern about previously approved boathouses on the southeastern point of Skerrey Point previously approved by the Lake George Park Commission.  No stormwater management information was provided on the site plan submitted.  DECEMBER 2009 - The majority of the previous comments of the Waterkeeper remain for the application:  concern about the stream corridor setbacks; need for wetland delineation;  no stormwater management; on-site wastewater treatment design; and lack of a water supply for Lot 2.  SEPTEMBER 2010 - The Waterkeeper expressed concerns about the substantial clearing that had occured on the property; segmentation of the SEQR process and environmental review; alternative locations for combined access to Lots 2 & 3 with less disturbance; and a lack of stormwater management plans.  OCTOBER 2010 - The Waterkeeper expressed the following concerns:  lack of stormwater management; proximity of driveways to streams; need for wetland delineation; grading information for OWTS; differnt percolation rates and the need to address the existing dock permits.  JANUARY 2011 - The Waterkeeper expressed concern about the need to provide a major stormwater management plan, need for soil investigations and disturbance associated with the site development.  APRIL 2011 - The Waterkeeper continues to have concerns about the incompleteness and inconsistencies in the application including:  failure to design a stormwater management plan to LGPC regulations; failure to provide soil investigations;  lack of stormwater collection and conveyance plans; inconsistency in stormwater details; lack of detail on proposed onsite wastewater system specifications; inconsistent information on grading plans; and excessive disturbance.   SEPTEMBER 2011 - Although the applicant reduced the number of lots frorm 4 to 3 and eliminated the driveway that required significant earthwork, the Waterkeeper has concerns about the incomplete application material, inconsistent information contained in the plans, non compliant stormwater management plan and overall amount of disturbance and clearing proposed on steep slopes in close proximity to the lake.

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to Town of Putnam Planning Board December 2008.  Please refer to Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board September 2010, October 2010, January 2011, April 2011, July 2011, September 2011, and February 2012. 

Next Meeting: A public hearing was held on December 8, 2008 by the Town of Putnam Planning Board.  There were significant issues raised by the Planning Board members and the Waterkeeper.  The Planning Board closed the public hearing.  At the January 14, 2009 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board denied the Eliopolous subdivision application based on non compliance with the Town's septic system requirement, failure to submit a stormwater management plan and the impact of the development to the character of the land.   REVISED 5 LOT APPLICATION:  Application was tabled at the Deecember 9, 2009 Planning Board meeting by the applicant.  Application will be discussed at the May 12, 2010 Planning Board meeting.  At the May 2010 meeting, the Planning Board accepted the application and determined the application ot be a major subdivision (despite the fact it is 4 new lots) since all proposed lots do not front on a public right-of-way.  The Board expressed concern about the small lake front lot (approximately 5,000 sf) created from lake access for the proposed lot east of Gull Bay Road.  At the September 8, 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board refused to hear the application for the proposed driveway for Lots 2 & 3 since there was not an approved subdivision and the application was premature.  At the October 13, 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board determined the revised application was a sketch plan.  The Planning Board expressed concern about the easements granted to Blythwood after the previous subdivision approval; need for a 50' ROW for Lots 2 & 3; concern about the fill required for the common driveway and proximity to the stream; need to replace the existing septic system for the gatehouse.  The application was tabled pending additional information.  At the November 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Board affirmed the project had sketch plan approval and it was deemed a major subdivision.  Board members expressed concern about the separate partial shoreline lot for access for Lot 4A, the number of curb cuts to Lot 4 and deeded rights, the proposed wastewater beds for Blythewood property on Lot 4, and the amount of clearing proposed for the infrastructure.  The Planning Board tabled the application pending the following information:  Lot 1 septic resolution; recreational road location; review of deeds by Town attorney; Stormwater runoff from Lots 2 & 3; addressing fill for common driveway and status of Lot 4A.  The Planning Board discussed the application at the December 2010 meeting reaffirming the concern about Lot 4A not being builable and therefore, not approvable and are seeking recommendations from the Town attorney regarding the easements. The plan lacks stormwater management and a Long Environmental Assessment Form.  The Planning Board reviewed the revised application at their February 9, 2011 Planning Board meeting.  The Board expressed concern about the presentation of the plans, the need for additional information on the stormwater management system and separation requirements for the onsite wastewater treatment systems.  The application was tabled for revised plans. The revised application was placed on the April 13, 2011 Planning Board agenda.  At the April 13, 2011 Planning Board meeting, the Bord expressed concern about the previous easements on the original subdivision which were not approved by the Planning Board, the status of the 50' ROW, submission of the stormwater plan to the LGPC and the septic plans.  The Board continued to feel there was too much development on the property.  The Board felt the application was a major subdivision.  The application was discussed at the July 13, 2011 Planning Board meeting and the applicant requested the Town of Putnam Planning Board declare themselves lead agent for the SEQR review.  The Planning Board recommended that the LGPC be lead agent since the project will be a major stormwater project.  The application was tabled pending LGPC stormwater review and SEQR determination.  The application was initially placed on the September 14, 2011 agenda for the review of a new three lot subdivision but was tabled at the applicant's request.   The revised plan was heard at the November 8, 2011 Planning Board meeting. The Planning Board stated the plan continues to improve but there are concerns about the proposed removal of the knoll on Lot 3, need to provide proper width of access to Lot 1 (Blythewood), concern about the proposed absorption beds for Lot 1 on Lot 4, amount of clearing proposed and the condition of existing dock permits.  The application was tabled for additional information.  At the December 14, 2010 meeting, the Planning Board expressed concern about the amount of vegetation removal and clearing required for Lot 3 and felt it would change the character of the neighborhood.  The Planning Board also expressed concern about the size of the proposed houses (6,000 sf) and recommended downsizing to reduce disturbance.  There was also discussion about the number and location of docks and requested consideration of locating all docks on the southern side of the point.  The application was tabled pending additional information.    At the January 10, 2012 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board determined the project to be a Major Subdivision and scheduled a public hearing for February 12, 2012.  There was discussion regarding the previously granted septic easements for Lot 1 on Lot 4 and the Town Attorney determined the easements cannot be reviewed at this time since they were previously granted.  The Town Attorney did stated the easements could be reviewed when work started on the septic easements.   FEBRUARY 2012 - A public hearing was held and the Planning Board expressed concerns about the need for deeds detailing lakeshore access; stormwater management compliance; wastewater treatment compliance; emergency vehicular access; and elevation/grading and visual assessment for Lot 3.  The public hearing was closed but no decision rendered due to lack of quarum.  MARCH 2012 - The Lake George Park Commission assumed Lead Agency status for the SEQR review and issued a detailed comment letter. The applicant did not show up for the March 14, 2012 Planning Board meeting.  The Waterkeeper raised a question about the 45 day time limit to render a decison after the close of the public hearing, which would lapse before the next meeting.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board denied the subdivision application based on: 1) failure to submit subdivision fees; 2) Failure to respond to 7 requested items; and 3) incomplete stormwater application. 

 ELIOPOULOS - GATEHOUSE (UPDATED 11/2/09)

Project Summary: The applicant is seeking an after the fact site plan approval for a expansion of the existing Gatehouse located on Gull Bay Road.  Constructed had started on a 12' wide deck on 2 sides of the house which did not comply with the original proposed plans and appears to exceed the allowable 25% expansion of an existing structure.  Planning Board discussed the adequecy of the existing septic system and where it was located.  Applicant claimed it was installed 18 years ago for a 3-bedroom house.  Planning Board the need to review the septic system since the project did not increase the wasteflow or the number of bedrooms.

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the existing septic system location and adequacy and the need to certify septic systems when projects are proposed on a site.

Waterkeeper Comments: No comments submitted

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board approved the proposed site plan 4-1 at the October 14, 2009 Planning Board meeting.

Project Summary: The applicant proposes an approximate 800 sf addition to an existing residence along with a screened porch at 5183 Sagamore Road.  The existing strucutre has a 115 foot setback and with the porch addition, the setback will be reduced to 103 feet.  The addition will increase the number of bedrooms from 2 to 3 requiring an upgrade to the existing non-compliant on-site wastewater treatment system.  The applicant proposes a gravelless absorption system.  This initial stormwater plan prepared for the Lake George Park Commission was denied and an engineer has been hired.  A stormwater management plan was submitted to the Lake George Park Commission by the October 14, 2009 Planning Board meeting and a permit was expected by October 16, 2009.  In addition, the site plan was modified to keep traffic off the septic system.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included concerns about the proposed location of the absorption field under the parking area and the need for stormwater infiltration.

Waterkeeper Comments:  Provided verbal comments at a September 9, 2009 public hearing regarding protection of the on-site wastewater treatment system from traffic.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board held a public hearing on September 9, 2009.  The public hearing was closed.  The application was tabled pending the submission of a stormwater management plan.  The Town of Putnam Plannning Board granted approval at their October 14, 2009 meeting condition upon submission of the Stormwater Management Permit from the LGPC and no traffic over the septic system. 

FREUD (UPDATED 11/20/09)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes a two-lot subdivision of a 5 acre parcel on the west side of Dark Bay.  One lot would be 2-1/4 ac with an existing house, boathouse and workshop and the second would be 2-3/4 ac.  The Planning Board expressed concern about the creation of a landlocked parcel, according to the interpretation of the Town Code, each lot must have frontage on a public right-of-way (Town owned or maintained road).  The access to the proposed lots would be through an existing easement.  Soil investigations were provided but not certified.  A non-jurisdictional letter has been received from the Adirondack Park Agency.  October 2009 - The Planning Board consulted the Town Counsel regarding the required frontage on a public road and it was stated there is a need to provide safe access for emergency vehicles.  The applicant requested a waiver from the required frontage on a public road.  Additional information was provided regarding the percolation tests and setbacks to the lake which was 215 feet. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the ability to provide a compliant wastewater treatment system as well as stormwater management for all development, existing and proposed.  The Lake George Waterkeeper recommended site plan review for any future development as well as locating existing wastewater treatment systems. 

Waterkeeper Comments:  Please refer to Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board Novermber 2009.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board tabled the application at the September 10, 2009 penfding additional information - justification of right-of-way or waiver request and ceritifed percolation tests. At their October 14, 2009 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board granted a waiver the requirement for frontage on a public road and scheduled a public hearing for November 11, 2009.  At the November 11, 2009 public hearing, information was provided on the existing septic system which was installed in 1984.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board approved the subdivision 6-0 with the condition future development would require site plan review. 

GRENNON (UPDATED 6/25/10)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes to replace the existing one story camp with a two story house at 4042 Beach Lane (11.20-2-11).  The proposal is to utilize the same size footprint and add a second story.  The applicant owns two adjacent small parcels with a total width of 125'.  The existing on-site wastewater treatment system (OWTS) consists of a septic tanks and laterals.  The orignial sketch plan submission was going to be changed from placing the house on the existing footprint.  The applicant resubmitted a plan for the November 2009 Planning Board meeting.  The proposed residence was relocated to the south east portion of the property accessed by an existing dirt drive.  A new on-site wastewater treatment system was proposed with an Eljen absorption field.  The proposed OWTS would only provide a 50' separation to the proposed on-site well and 75' to the neighboring properties' wells.  November 2009 Planning Board meeting - The Planning Board discussed concerns regarding the separation between wells (on site and neighboring) to the proposed septic system.  The Planning Board stated they were in favor of the redevelopment of the site but issues on the OWTS needed to be resolved with Department of Health regulations.  MAY 2010 - The applicant reappeated in front of the Planning Board with a similiar plan that was presented in November.  It was stated the separation to proposed well was maximized and the well would be protected with casing to bedrock.  It was stated that it was the best that could be done on the pre-existing, non-conforming lot.        

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included:  the lack of stormwater management for the house, information regarding the proposed OWTS and extent of grading and disturbance for the site.  The Lake George Waterkeeper reviewed the November 2009 submission and expressed concens about the reduced setback to wells on the property and for the neighbors and proper separation to the seasonal high groundwater.  The Lake George Waterkeeper recommended enhanced treatment units for improved wastewater treatment.  The Waterkeeper provided information to the applicant regarding the proposed enhanced systems at the Novermber 2009 Planning Board meeting.  For the June 2010, the Waterkeeper expressed similiar concerns regarding the on-site wastewater treatment system as well as the need for stormwater management for the site development to reduce downstream runoff problems experienced on Link Way. 

Waterkeeper Comments:  Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board November 2009 and June 2010. 

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board suggested the applicant finalize the sketch plan and return with additiona information on the proposed house location, off-street parking and OWTS.  At the November 11, 2009 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board tabled the application requesting the applicant to obtain a waiver from the Department of Health on separation requirements between wells and OWTS and to review the installation of enhanced treatment systems.  MAY 2010 -  The Planning Board reviewed the application and stated the applicant "Did the best he could" to provide the separation and protection of the proposed well.  The Board recommended the applicant request a waiver from Section 8.030 regarding separation requirements for wells and this was granted.  The Board asked about stormwater and felt a plan would be requried.  The Planning Board scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, June 9, 2010 at 7:00PM. 

HANDLEY SUBDIVISION (TIROGA MEADOWS)(UPDATED 5/16/12)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes a 8 lot subdivision on 21 +ac. - 7 developed, 6 new building lots and 2 lake access (1 common).  One lot has a pre-existing building.  The property is divided by the Town of Putnam/Ticonderoga line as well as the Washington/Putnam County line.  There will a common lot for access to Lake George.  The project will require APA permit as well as permit from the Lake George Park Commission for the dock complex and stormwater management.  The applicant states there is a 1500 sf footprint, 2-story limit on building size.  Development is proposed along the west side of Black Point Road with all driveways.  Lots will be accessed through common driveways to service two lots.  There will be common stormwater management systems consisting of rain gardens and a wet meadow with discharge under an access drive in the common lot. A large area of the existing meadow is proposed to be undisturbed.  The common lot will have parking for access to the lake along with an existing barn that will be converted to a club house.  A dock complex is proposed but no information has been supplied.  Wastewater will be handled through connections to the Black Point Road Sewer District.  Water supply will be on-site wells.  The applicant required a variance from the Lake George Park Commission regarding infilltration with percolation rate of greater than 60 minutes.  The stormwater management system consisted of two large rain gardens to capture the runoff from the proposed dwellings.  The rain gardens would discharge into a large wet meadow that would be created by the access road to the common lakefront area.  There would be a maximum detention area of 2 feet deep.  The applicant also required a Lake George Park Commission for the association docks proposed to be 68' long and 40' wide.  The dock would have a surface area of 700 sf and restricted boat length of 22 feet.  The applicant claims the water depth is 3 feet.  The applicant submitted a revised dock application in January 2011 which reduced the number of boat slips to 4 and the overall dimensions to 61' to 68' long and 32' wide.   FEBRUARY 2012 - The applicant made submission to the Town of Putnam Planning Board with revised plans and an APA permit.       

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns on the sketch plan about the ability fo the site to accomodate stormwater management and impacts to emergent wetlands on the shoreline, which were determined to be along the shoreline for a previous subdivision to the west.   Regarding the Preliminary Plan, the Waterkeeperr had concerns about the following:  1) density calculations;  2) specific information on the construction of the stormwater system; 3) Planting Plan;  4) Buffer along the existing stream;  5) Buffer along the wetlands; 6) Information on the proposed dock complex;  7) Wetland information along the shoreline; and 8) Individual site plan review for the lots.  The Waterkeeper has concerns about the proposed association dock and potential conflict with wetlands.   

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board, February 2010.

Next Meeting: The applicant provided a sketch plan discussion to the Planning Board in June 2009.  The Preliminary Plan was reviewed at the Town of Putnam Planning Board at the February 10, 2010 meeting.  The Planning Board expressed concerns about:  1) more permanent sanitary facilities at the common lot;  2) deed covenant information;  3) 1500 sf maximum footprint;  4) Lot 1 no dwellings;  5) no specified width or ROW on common driveway;  6) emergency vehicle access; and 7) site plan review for individual lots.  There were numerous comments by public.  The application was tabled to a later date for updates from the applicant.  The Lake George Park Commission reviewed the stormwater management plan and requested variance at their December 21, 2010 meeting.  Conerns regarding the stormwater were the viability of the project, self imposed variance and erosion due to the boathouse construction.  The LGPC granted the variance with a 6-2 vote with the following conditions:  1) Provide and adequate maintenance agreement and bond; 2) Road to be constructed first: 3) Boathouse construction to be reviewed by staff prior to start; and 4) Deed restriction of no disturbance line (for house construction) from rain gardens towards lake on single family lots.  The LGPC reviewed the association dock proposal at the December 21, 2010 meeting.  The Commission expressed the following concerns:  length of docks; depth of water; potential impacts to lake bed; and application lacked depth information.  The Commission denied dock application 7-1.  The Lake George Park Commission reviewed the new dock application for a total of 4 slips at their January 2011 meeting.  The Commission approved the new dock application with conditions:  1) No lifts will be permitted, 2) No launching of vessels and 3) All conditions are to recorded with the HOA and deeds.   FEBRUARY 2012 - The Town of Putnam Planning Board reviewed the application and scheduled a public hearing for March 14, 2012 for Final Approval.   MARCH 2012 - A the March 14, 2012 Town of Putnam Plannig Board meeting, a public hearing was held and no comments were made.  The Planning Board appoved the majr subdivision. 

HARDING (UPDATED 10/20/10)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes renovations to an existing camp constructed in 1911 at 153 Moosewood Way in Glenburnie.  The applicant is proposing to extend the roofline and add a bedroom.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board requested a Site Plan review and the applicant stated the expansion was below 25% and therefore, did not require Site Plan Review.       

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns regarding the need for an evaluation of the existing on-site wastewater treatment system and the ability to accomodate an additional bedroom.  The Waterkeeper also recommended the implementation of stormwater management.

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board, February 2010.

Next Meeting: At the January 13, 2010 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board passed a resolution the project could proceed without a Site Plan review.  However, the Code Enforcement Officer would need to approve the OWTS prior to the issuance of a Ceritifcate of Occupancy.  At the August 11, 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board authorized sending a letter Harding requesting a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy and the certification of the septic system for four bedrooms since the dwelling has been occupied over the summer.  At the October 13, 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Board discussed the continued failure of the applicant to provide the adequate certification on the septic system.  The applicant proposed in August 2010 to remove a wall on the den and then the number of bedrooms would remain the same.  The Plannning Board decided to send a letter to the applicant reaffirming their resolution requiring a certification of the septic system.

HERTTUA (UPDATED 12/18/12)

Project Summary: The applicant has made preformed land development activities without site plan approval or permits at 3087 Lake George Way (7.7-2-21).  The applicant has cleared trees between the dwelling and the shoreline, constructed three retaining walls (including one for a beach), enclosed a stream and constructed a shoreline patio.  The Town of Puntam Planning Board requested the applicant to discuss the proposed disturbances with the Board to determine if Site Plan Review was necessary.  The APA and LGPC have visited the site to determine the need for permits. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper visited the site and detailed disturbance to the APA and LGPC.  The Waterkeeper has concerns about the lack of stormwater management, increased runoff from the disturbance activities and the need for a shoreline buffer. 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Lake George Waterkeeper letter to the Adirondack Park Agency May 2012, to the Lake George Park Commission July 2012 and to te Town of Putnam Planning Board December 2012.

Next Meeting: At the August 8, 2012 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board determined the land use activities at the site required Site Plan Review due to the level of reqired maintenance at the property.  A public hearing as set for September 12, 2012.  The applicant failed to show for the September 2012 Planning Board meeting.  The applicant was represented by an agent at the October 10, 2012 Planning Board meeting but the application was incomplete.  The Planning Board stated a scaled site plan with information on the stormwater system was missing and feedback from the LGPC was requested.  The Planning Board issued a stop work order at the October 2012 meeting.  The Planning Board reviewed the application at the December 12, 2012 meeting.  After extensive discussion of the plan, the Planning Board approved the plan 5-1 with reservations since it was an after-the-fact with a condition of the submission of the LGPC Stormwater Permit.     

JACOBS/STAFFORD (UPDATED 10/19/10)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes the construction of a single family dwelling on Black Point Road (4.09-1-10).  The project is located on a 1.39 acre parcel in the Moderate Intensity (lake shore portion) and Resource Management (east of Black Point Road) APA Land Use Designation.  The parcel was cleared and graded 8 years ago in preparation for development.  A Lake George Park Commission Stormwater Permit was previously issued.  The proposed project will require a variance from the APA for shoreline setback (100' required and 80' proposed).  The proposed development will be located in previously disturbed area and no additional clearing is proposed.  The proposed dwelling will be 2300 sf.  The dwelling will connect to the Black Point Road Sewer District and have a private well for a water supply.  The project will have a minor stormwater management plan consisting of infiltration galleries to manage runoff from the building and upper driveway and a grass swale is proposed along Black Point Road to manage runoff from the lower driveway.  The project will require a variance from the LGPC for separation from infiltration devices to a well (100' required and 55' provided) and from infiltration devices to the lake (100' required and 34' provided).  Black Point Road is proposed to be regraded towards the proposed swale.  A planting plan was proposed to install a series of shrubs and junipers along the lake shore to improve the buffer.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included:  reducing disturbance, clearing and grading along Black Point Road; provide soil investigations where infiltration galleries are proposed; provide a replanting plan; and show proposed foundation drains to prevent impact to stormwater management system.   

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board September 2010 and October 2010. 

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board reviewed the application at their September 8, 2010 meeting.  The Board accepted the application, deemed it a Type II site plan and tabled requesting additional information:  LGPC stormwater approval, low growth planting west side of road along lake, planting on steep banks and engineered plans for retaining wall behind dwelling.  On September 28, 2010, the LGPC reviewed the variance application and the Commission expressed cncerns about off-site runoff onto driveway, maintenance and soils.  The LGPC granted the variance with the following conditions:  1) Prior to backfill, all stormwater measures to be witnessed by staff or licensed professional; 2) Require additional E&S controls between Oct 15 - April 15; and 3) If devices do not work, no construction will proceed without modifications.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board reviewed the application at their October 13, 2010 meeting.  The Planning Board conceptually approved pending APA variance and a scaled site map.

 JOHNSON (UPDATED 5/28/09)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes the construction of a 1500 sf house in the Royal Anchorage subdivision (12-5-13).  The applicant will connect to the newly constructed community wastewater system.  The project required a minor stormwater project and received a permit from the Lake George Park Commission (5346-16-07).  Stormwater management system consisted of (8) Storm-Tech chambers installed behind a retaining wall. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper concerns included:  the installation of an underedrain under the infiltration device which would discharge the infiltrated stormwater, location of stormwater for the driveway surface and clarify the details on the number of Storm-Tech chambers 

Waterkeeper Comments: Please refer to the Waterkeeper comment letter to the Town of Putnam Planning Board May 2009.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board held a public hearing on May 13, 2009 and approved the project with the following conditions:  NYSDEC final signoff on the wastewater system; copy of approval sent to George Outcult and LGPC signoff on map.

LGLC/Royal Anchorage  (UPDATED 7/27/11)

Project Summary: The applicants propose a land swap that would connect two properties owned by the Lake George Land Conservancy (Gull Bay Preserve and Gabriels tract) while providing a building lot for Royal Anchoarge Estates.  The lot to be conveyed to the LGLC is from the common property of the Royal Anchorage HOA and is unbuildable, comprised mostly of wetlands, with an acreage of 2.96 acres.  The lot to be conveyed to Royal Anchorage Estates would be 5.28 acres and is located off Sagamore Road.  The lot has steep access and soil testing was scheduled with the APA. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper does not oppose the conveyance of land to the LGLC but has concerns about the potential increase in density of the Royal Anchorage Estates and whether there would be lake access granted to the new lot.  This may violate APA permit conditions

Waterkeeper Comments: No comments at this time 

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board discussed the application at their June 8, 2011 Planning Board meeting.  It was determined the application would be separated into two separate 2-lot subdivisions.  The Royal Anchorage subdivision would be creation of a non builable lot and would require a waiver from the Code based on the fact that the land does not provide sufficient land to build on due to wetlands.  The LGLC subdivision would require the determination that the lot was a buildable lot and rerquire water, sewer, house location and stormwater along with a topographic map as well as input from the APA.  The applications were tabled pending additional information.

MORGAN SUBDIVISION (UPDATED 11/27/08)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes a two lot subdivision, creating a 1.3 acre lot from a larger parcel.  The land is deszsignted Low Intensity Use by the APA.  A stormwater management plan was prepared and submitted to the Lake George Park Commission.  The Planning Board expressed concern about the existing boathouses and the setback of the proposed on-site wastewater treatment system from an intermittent stream. 

UPDATE - In response to correct an existing washout which resulted in a water quality violation, the owner was required to replace culverts removed on Gull Bay Road.  A plan was submitted to the LGPC and a series of culverts were placed under Gull Bay Road.  The culverts were installed but the project was not completed:  areas are left unstabilized without matting, rip rap or vegetation and erosion is evident.  Document was submitted to the LGPC in August 2010.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper is concern about the impact on the existing stream on the property and the ability to provide stormwater management and wastewater treatment on the lake side lot.

Waterkeeper Comments: The Waterkeeper is preparing comments for the December 2008 public heating. 

Next Meeting: A public hearing has been scheduled by the Town of Putnam Planning Board for Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 7:00PM.

TOWN OF PUTNAM SEWER DISTRICT #1 - ROYAL ANCHORAGE SUBDIVISION (UPDATED 9/17/08)

Project Summary: Royal Anchoarge subdivision is a 23-lot subdivision with 21 building lots approved by the Adirondack Park Agency in 1982 (APA Permit 82-1 & 82-1A).  The subdivision will be serviced by a centralized community sewage treatment system and the Town of Putnam formed Sewer District No. 1.  Each lot will contain a grinder pump with a connection to a low pressure sewer collection system.  The treatment plant and collection system were approved by the Adirondack Park Agency in 2007 (APA Permit 2003-32).  The status of the project was discussed at the May 2009 Town of Putnam Town Board meeting and the final testing was performed and the final sign-off was pending the installation of electrical gear.  At the July 8, 2009 Town of Putnam Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board passed a resolution to the Town Board expressing concern of the state of stablization at the site and potential of erosion and sedimentation present.  Supervisor LaPointe stated the Town has done all it could to hold the contractor accountable for the state of the site, informed them of punch list items and has withheld $15,000.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper submitted comment letters to the Adirondack Park Agency and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the classification of the wastewater treatment system, design of the system, applicable standards, construction disturnbance disturbance impacts and erosion control.

The Waterkeeper performed a site visit in early July and expressed concern at the July 9, 2009 Town of Putnam Town Board and suggested holding a meeting to work towards resolution of the existing erosive conditions at the site.

Waterkeeper Comments: On August 8, 2008, the Waterkeeper documented significant violations with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and notified the NYSDEC and APA.  See the August 2008 letter.

Next Meeting: The project status was discussed at the September 11, 2008 Town Board meeting were Superviosr John LaPointe referred to a meeting scheduled with the NYSDEC.  The NYSDEC has issed a Notice of Violation to the Town of Putnam and Bombard Construction regarding the failure to comply with the SWPPP.   At the July 9, 2009 Town of Putnam Town Bord meeting, Supervisor LaPointe was very disturbed at comments raised regarding the project and current state and refused a meeting requested by the Waterkeeper.  A subsequest contact of the Town Attorney by the Waterkeeper tentatively scheduled a meeting at the site.

ROYAL ANCHORAGE    ESTATES (UPDATED 3/2/11)

Project Summary: Royal Anchoarge Estates subdivision is a 23-lot subdivision with 22 building lots approved by the Adirondack Park Agency in 1982 (APA Permit 82-1 & 82-1A).  The project has 10 lakefront lots and 12 lots off the lake.  Lots were to be serviced by a centralized sewage collection system and treatment plant that was approved in 2007.  The original permit conditions limited the size of buildings to 1500 square feet (excluding garages).  The Association has submitted a request to amend the conditions of the permit to increase the size of buildings to 2250 square feet.   

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the proposed application including:  the numerous site constraints present that limit the ability to mitigate impacts from development including limited soils, steep slopes, vegetation; compromising stormwater management and creating the need for variances from the stormwater regulations; significant impacts the Royal Anchorage Estates had on Lake George from increased runoff, erosion and sedimentation from the sewage collection system construction, wastewater treatment site, individual site development and road drainage system and the increased clearing allowed on the property.  All of these has resulted in an undue adverse impact to the Park.

Waterkeeper Comments: See Lake George Waterkeeper letter to the Adirondack Park Agency, March 2011.

Next Meeting: The Adirondack Park Agency determined the application was complete and issued a Notice for Public Comment.  The comment period ends March 3, 2011.

SAWLUSKI (UPDATED 12/18/12)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes to construct a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 3057 Lake George Way (17.8-1-16). The property is located in the Moderate Intensity land Use (Adirondack Park Land Use Designation). The project will require Site Plan Review by the Town of Putnam Plannng Board.  The project received nonjurisdictional letters from the Adirondack Park Agency and the Lake George Park Commission.  The existing dwelling is 692sf (3 bedroms) and the proposed second story addition will be 528 sf.  The dwelling recently had a new onsite wastewater treatment system installed sized for four bedrooms.  There is not stormwater management roposed for the property.  

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper does not oppose the proposed project and supports the upgraded septic system.  The Waterkeeper would recommend the installation of stormwater management for the existing impervious cover.

Waterkeeper Comments: See Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to Town of Putnam Planning Board December 2012.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board reviewed the application at the December 12, 2012 meeting.  The Board determined the project was a Type II Site Plan and scheduled a public hearing for January 8, 2012.   

SMITH (UPDATED 7/23/09)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes the construction of a 2300 sf guest house on the east side of Gull Bay Road and demolish two existing structures.  The project would be an increase in impervious cover of 19%.  The property is the location of the RPI/DFWI field office and contains 6.7 acres.  The project would utilize the existing turf driveway.  The existing septic system would be utilized, which serviced two buildings for RPI.  The project is under 1,000 sf impervious coverage and does not require stormwater management permit from the Lake George Park Commission.  The applicant proposes eave trenches for stormater management. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has expressed concerns about the use of eave trenches, expecially with the installation of the foundation drain directly below the infiltration area.  Regarding the on-site wastewater treatment system, the Waterkeeper contacted RPI staff and found the system most recelty installed (1970s) for the laboratory was removed when the site was vacated and the OWTS for the dormitory was the old seepage pit.  Thereforem, the existing OWTS needs to be determined and certified.

Waterkeeper Comments: See Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to Town of Putnam Planning Board July 2009.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board accepted the application and deemed the application as a Type II action since it is on the lake.  The Planning Board set a public hearing for July 8, 2009.  At the July 9, 2009 meeting, the Town of Putnam Planning Board approved the project with the following conditions - OWTS verification and APA and LGPC verification letters. 

SPELMAN  (UPDATED 5/12/11)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes a lot line adjustment with the adjoining neighbors (Michalowski) for their property at 457 Gull Bay Road (11.20-3-6.1).  The property is located in the Moderate Intensity land Use (Adirondack Park Land Use Designation).  The application is proposing to obtain 698 sq. ft. north of their existing property near the intersection of Gull Bay Road and Gull Bay Heights. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper does not oppose the proposed lot line adjustment but recommends additional information for the application:  state if there are plans for any expansions; are any utilities located on the subject land; and stormwater management improvements in the vicinity.

Waterkeeper Comments: See Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to Town of Putnam Planning Board May 2011.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board will review the application at their May 11, 2011 meeting.  At the may 11, 2011 meeting, the Planning Board determined the applicant needed an authorization form from the adjoining landowner and needed a detailed description of the proposed area for the lot line adjustment.  The application was tabled until the June 8, 2011 meeting.

SWEET (UPDATED 11/11/10)

Project Summary: The applicant has constructed a second story addition without receiving site plan review approval at 2437 Black Point Road (4-1-41).  The existing dwelling has portions with three stories and two stories.  The property is connected to the Black Point Road Sewer District.  There does not appear to be any stormwater management.  There is substantial alteration to the shoreline and all vegetation has been removed.  The shoreline is built up with gabbion walls.  At the November 2010 meeting, the applicant stated they had a building permit, followed the process and did not need a site plan review.  The applicant expressed concern about the recommendations of the Waterkeeper. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the complete lack of a shoreline buffer and no apparent stormwater management on the site for the house or the parking area that is located on the shoreline.

Waterkeeper Comments: See Lake George Waterkeeper comment letter to Town of Putnam Planning Board November 2010.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board sent a letter to the applicant informing them of the need for a site plan review for the addition.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board will review the application at their November 10, 2010 meeting.  At the November 2010 meeting, the Planning Board determined site plan review was not required but requested the submission of a site plan for the process.  The Board recommended the applicant to install stormwater management measures to treat stormwater before it enters the lake. 

WHITE (UPDATED 9/10/12)

Project Summary: The applicant proposes a seven lot subdivision on a total of 59.6 acres at the end of Gull Bay Road Extension.  6 of the 7 lots will have lake access.  The property has a Rural Use APA Land Use Designation.  The project will have a 2100 lf 16' wide gravel road for access to the lots.  Individual on-site wastewater treatment systems are proposed and on-site wells are proposed for water supply.  A stormwater management plan has bene prepared utilizing the minor project design criteria.  Stormwater management is proposed along the proposed subdision road and consists of a 2' x 2' infiltration trench.  There is not stormwater management information provided for the propsoed development on the individual lots.  Two of the lots are to be gifted to family members.  The APA has declared jurisdiction over 4 of the 6 proposed lots.  The applicant's engineer claims that stormwater management is possible on the individual lots.  For the Novermber 2010 meeting, the applicant stated meetings have been held with APA and the density is within APA regulations and they prefer to obtain preliminary approval before submitting to the APA.  The applicant submitted a Short Environmental Assessment Form.  The applicant stated they have reached out to all residents on the private road about the condition and said there is no formal agreement on the maintenance and it would be difficult to reach one.  The applicant stated they have met on site with APA engineer to review the site for practicable locations for house site but it was not a "long term investigation" and state all sites shown are accaptable sites.   JUNE 2011 - Applicant made presentation to Planning Board with updated plans including individual lot site plans and stated that the APA and LGPC submissions have not been made.    FEBRUARY 2012 - The applicant made submission to the Town of Putnam Planning Board with revised plans that provided updates on submittals to the Lake George Park Commission and the Adirondack Park Agency. 

Waterkeeper Perspective: The Waterkeeper has concerns about the grades on the property and the suitability to construct a road on 60% grades.  The Waterkeeper has questions about the proposed stormwater management for the road and would recommend a major stormwater management plan be prepared for all disturbance on the site.  Additionally, the stormwater management plan is incomplete and segments the project.  There is concern about the extent of disturbance, clearing and grading required to accomodate development on the steep slopes of the lots and a visual assessment should be performed.  The owner is already advertising "Lots For Sale" with a large sign along the lake shore.  Upon review of the preliminary plans, concerns remained regarding the lack of a compliant stormwater management plan, failure to submit an application to the LGPC, onsite wastewater treatment systems on slopes that exceed allowable slopes, extent of disturbance for road construction, failure to show final contours, need for visual assessment and lack of detail for the proposed convenants.  January 2011 Revisions - The Waterkeeper remained concerned about the disturbance for the development of the individual lots, details on the onsite wastewater treatment systems and misrepresentations in the calculations of the stormwater management report.  The Waterkeeper submitted extensive comments on the Stormwater Management Permit to the Lake George Park Commission regarding misrepresentation in runoff values; failure to comply with LGPC regulations regarding cold climate conditions, separation to wastewater treatment systems, and pretreatment requirements;  incorrect impervious cover in calculations; protection of proposed infiltration areas; incorrect areas of infiltration application in infiltration trenches and numerous individual site concerns. 

Waterkeeper Comments: See Lake George Waterkeeper comments to Town of Putnam Planning Board October 2010, November 2010 and February 2011;  See comments to the Lake George Park Commission February 2012.

Next Meeting: The Town of Putnam Planning Board accepted the application at the August 11, 2010 meeting and determined the project to be a major subdivision.  The Planning Board requested deeds for the access to the site, expressed concern about the limited number of turnarounds and the ability for emergency vehicles to access the site, questioned the applicant regarding the status of the APA and LGPC permits.  The Planning Board required a stormwater management plan for the road but not for the individual lots.  The application was tabled pending additional information.  At the October 13, 2010 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board inquired about the ownership of the proposed road; asked about covenants and restrictions on the lots and mainenance of the road; requested additional contour information; and stressed the need to work with the existing residents on Gull Bay Road Extension to make the road more safe.  The Plannning Board accepted the preliminary plat and scheduled a public hearing for November 10, 2010 poending the submission of: roadway maintenance restictions; 2 foot contours; road cross sections; written request for a waiver from frontage on public roads; easement information.  The Town Board expressed concern about the proposed project and felt the public hearing was premature due to the information not being available for review.  At the November 2010 public hearing, residents expressed concern about potential impacts of construction to the existing road, safety of the road, need to upgrade the road and concern about the number of docks and lake rights for Lot 7.  The Planning Board is having the Town attorney review the deeds regarding logal access, ability to expand the access and whether the subdivision meets the Town standards for access.  The Planning Board closed the public hearing and there was a mutual agreement with the applicant to extent the time frame to render a decision.  The Planning Board tabled the application pending additional information regarding:  existing access road and if it can be improved/widened for safety; waiver to access to public road; concerns about the amount of fill for the subdivision road and wastewater treatment sites.  February 2011 - At the February 9, 2011 Putnam Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board expressed concern about the Gull Bay Road improvements and mechanism to set up, Homeowners agreement, and concern about the septic systems, builability of the lots and stormwater plans.  The Planning Board granted preliminary approval 4-3 but refused to perform SEQR review claiming it was premature and information was lacking.  The waiver for the frontage on purblic roads was granted for the subdivision.  The application was tabled pending an opinion from the Town Attorney on the SEQR review.  JUNE 2011 - The applicant requested the Town of Putnam Planning Board declare themselves lead agency for SEQR review.  Planning Board stated they would not start SEQR process until APA and LGPC submissions are made and feedback is provided.  The Planning Board provided a 6 month extension for a decision.  The applicant requested no action on the SEQR until input is received from the APA.    FEBRUARY 2012 - The Town of Putnam Planning Board admitted there have been errors in the approval process and will attempt to correct.  The Planning Board determined to be Lead Agency for SEQR review and initiate a coordinated review.  SEQR will apply to the three proposed gift lots (Lots 2,3 & 6) since APA will not review those lots.  APA will review Lots 1,2,5 & 7.   A Public Comment Period was held by the Lake George Park Commission regarding the Stormwater Permit through February 14, 2012.  The applicant attended the July 11, 2012 Town of Putnam Planning Board meeting to discuss the status of the project and have a workshop meeting to review the Full Environmental Assessment Form.  The Board determined the action was Type I and the EAF was reviewed.  The Board determined the project action could have large impacts to physical changes to the property,affect surface water quality, alter drainage patterns, alter surface water runoff and will affect Critcal Environmental Areas.  The application was tabled until the August 8, 2012 Planning Board meeting.  AUGUST 2012 - The Planning Board informated the applicant information was lacking necessary for the review of the EAF.  The applicant stated a recent submission was made to the APA and a submission was pending to the LGPC.  The Board had questions regarding the Gull Bay Road Extension, stormwater runoff reduction from the proposed lots and maintenance along Gull Bay Road.  The Planning Board adopted a resolution for the Town to hire an engineer for review.  OCTOBER 2012 - The applicant received a third Incomplete Application Notification from the APA.  The applicant requested a 6 month extension to the preliminary approval and stated a resubmission was made to the LGPC and a resubmission to the APA was pending.  The Town of Putnam Planning Board granted a 6 month extension for the preliminary plan approval.